By Scott Farris
Because the 2012 presidential crusade starts off: Profiles of twelve males who've run for the presidency and misplaced, yet who, even in defeat, have had a better influence on American background than a lot of those that have served as president—from Henry Clay to Stephen Douglas, William Jennings Bryan to Al Gore—Plus, mini-profiles on 22 "honorable mentions."
Read or Download Almost President: The Men Who Lost the Race but Changed the Nation PDF
Best elections books
What concerns such a lot to electorate after they select their leaders? This e-book means that functionality politics is on the middle of up to date democracy, with citizens forming judgments approximately how good competing events and leaders practice on vital matters. Given the excessive stakes and uncertainty concerned, electorate depend seriously on partisan cues and occasion chief photos as courses to electoral selection.
From Face the state moderator and Slate columnist John Dickerson come the tales in the back of the tales of the main memorable moments in American presidential crusade background. The stakes are excessive. The characters choked with striving and ego. Presidential campaigns are a competition for regulate of energy within the strongest kingdom on the earth.
Given that 1952, the first election in a small, no longer very different New England kingdom has had a disproportionate influence at the U. S. presidential nomination approach and the consequent common election. even though only a handful of delegates are at stake, the recent Hampshire basic has turn into a huge media occasion and a fairly trustworthy predictor of a campaign's final good fortune or failure.
Extra resources for Almost President: The Men Who Lost the Race but Changed the Nation
Contents of the Collections The commercials in the archive date back to 1936 for radio and 1950 for television. S. S. congressional, gubernatorial, state legislative, other statewide offices, county and municipal, judicial, school board, and so on. The archive has materials from all 50 states and some foreign countries. It also contains advertisements for and against ballot issues (or propositions) and an increasing number of advocacy commercials that deal with public and social-policy questions, commercials by political action committees, and advertisements sponsored by corporations and special-interest groups on public issues.
Fourth, in the rather untidy world of political campaigning, the question of whether a statement is viewed as true or false often depends upon context, perspective, and motivation, thereby opening the door to partisan abuse. Whether administrative agencies or even courts can be sufficiently insulated from this pressure to render fair and nonpartisan decisions is problematical. Fifth, the use of civil litigation or government regulatory oversight can turn the mechanisms of government into political pawns, because such actions may have less to do with correcting the record or restoring one’s reputation than with inflicting political damage.
They decide instead to lose, and they proceed, either consciously or not, to do things that are clearly stupid and self-destructive. I’ve had three such candidates in my time. Two of them succeeded in losing. The third we were able to surround and protect from himself. Once in office, he decided he liked it and became a pretty good legislator. A variation on deciding to lose is the candidate who refuses to raise money. This is a widespread syndrome, and one with which I can sympathize. I wouldn’t trust a candidate who actually enjoys begging for money from people who generally want to see some specific benefit in return, and I think our campaign finance system should be radically reformed to break the hold that big contributors now enjoy.
Almost President: The Men Who Lost the Race but Changed the Nation by Scott Farris